Skip to content

Conversation

notriddle
Copy link
Contributor

No description provided.

@rust-highfive
Copy link
Contributor

r? @GuillaumeGomez

(rust-highfive has picked a reviewer for you, use r? to override)

@rust-highfive rust-highfive added the S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. label Nov 13, 2021
Copy link
Member

@GuillaumeGomez GuillaumeGomez left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

A bit hard to follow but seems like a good improvement in the end.

@GuillaumeGomez
Copy link
Member

Thanks!

@bors: r+

@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Nov 13, 2021

📌 Commit 688ed0a has been approved by GuillaumeGomez

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Nov 13, 2021
matthiaskrgr added a commit to matthiaskrgr/rust that referenced this pull request Nov 13, 2021
…uillaumeGomez

rustdoc: Use an empty Vec instead of Option<Vec>
bors added a commit to rust-lang-ci/rust that referenced this pull request Nov 14, 2021
…askrgr

Rollup of 3 pull requests

Successful merges:

 - rust-lang#90771 (Fix trait object error code)
 - rust-lang#90840 (relate lifetime in `TypeOutlives` bounds on drop impls)
 - rust-lang#90853 (rustdoc: Use an empty Vec instead of Option<Vec>)

Failed merges:

r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
@bors bors merged commit c677a8d into rust-lang:master Nov 14, 2021
@rustbot rustbot added this to the 1.58.0 milestone Nov 14, 2021
@notriddle notriddle deleted the notriddle/option-vec branch November 14, 2021 04:41
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants